🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since that time, focusing less on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is under way. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that impact society if anti-racism is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.